daveon: (Default)
[personal profile] daveon
Has anybody done any number crunching on what the outcome of this election would have been under the Alternative Vote system that's apparently on the table? 

Date: 2010-05-10 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
Yes. Not very different. So expect the Lib Dems to be keener on the Labour proposal (with AV now followed by referendum on other forms) than the Tory one, at the moment.

Date: 2010-05-10 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daveon.livejournal.com
Yes, but I've always expected that that would be the case (in terms of Lib Dems generally being keener on a Labour alliance...)

Of course, there are some horrific risks there with public perception - although the Brown resignation has been handled magnificently.

I guess we'll see.

In the mean time I'd better remember to get a postal ballot for the re-run.

Date: 2010-05-11 05:25 am (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
It's hard to be sure, because you don't know what people's second preferences would have been, and nor do you know how many would have changed their first preference if they'd been able to choose a second preference to fall back to.

Date: 2010-05-11 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, this. The ERS acknowledge these problems in the aticle linked above; but they don't go on to draw the reasonable conclusion "therefore, these projections are almost entirely worthless".

I think the proportion of people currently voting 'unnaturally' is really difficult to estimate. And I wouldn't trust any survey that sought to determine it to match what would actually happen in real election situation.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2025 07:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios