![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From Jerry Pournelle...
"The remarkable thing is that given the unpopular war, a President who does not project himself well and isn't charismatic at all, and the total economic collapse: given all that, the election was remarkably close. "
Errr... As I understand by recent and even historical standards this wasn't really close at all.
"The remarkable thing is that given the unpopular war, a President who does not project himself well and isn't charismatic at all, and the total economic collapse: given all that, the election was remarkably close. "
Errr... As I understand by recent and even historical standards this wasn't really close at all.
Blogged with the Flock Browser
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 12:26 am (UTC)I think Pournelle's statement is a mushy one he can defend whatever the numbers, as statements of the form "considering X, Y was remarkably large/small" tend to be. He's at liberty to adjust the values of X and Y to meet any objections, retrospectively if need be. If McCain had taken the electoral college with 49% of the popular vote, Pournelle could still easily have said "The remarkable thing is that given the unpopular war, a President who does not project himself well and isn't charismatic at all, and the total economic collapse: given all that, McCain's victory is remarkably convincing."
In EC terms, it's seventh out of the last ten and fourteenth out of the last twenty, but that's probably more a reflection of all the elections, post-Reagan, being smaller in EC terms than historically usual (I think). Also, the correct comparison ought perhaps to exclude the overwhelming electoral college sweeps popular incumbent presidents tend to get in their second election, and compare only first-time elections.